ArticlePharmaceutical research2025
Rapid Development of High Concentration Protein Formulation Driven by High-Throughput Technologies.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preventing physical and chemical degradation of the LABL-Fc-MOGAntibody therapeutics · 2026Article
- Emerging Technologies and Integrated Interdisciplinary Strategies for Mitigating Protein Aggregation in Therapeutic Formulations.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh concentration protein formulation (HCPF) development needs to balance protein stability attributes such as conformational/colloidal stability, chemical stability, and solution properties such as viscosity and osmolality. METHODOLOGY: A three-phase design is established in this work. In Phase 1, conformational and colloidal stability are measured by 384-well-based high-throughput (HT) biophysical screening while viscosity reduction screening is performed with HT viscosity screening. Collectively, the biophysical and viscosity screening data are leveraged to design the phase 2 of short-term stability study, executed using 96-well plates under thermal and freeze/thaw stresses. In phase 2, samples are analyzed by stability-indicating assays and processed with pair-wise Student's t-test analyses to choose the final formulations. In phase 3, the final formulations are then confirmed through a one-month accelerated stability in glass vials.
resultsUsing a model antibody A (mAb-A), the initial HT screening successfully established the 384-well based platform. A lead formulation was chosen from the second round based on statistical analyses and subsequently tested against the commercial formulation of mAb-A as a control. Compared to the control, the lead formulation reduced the viscosity of mAb-A by 30% and decreased subvisible particles after thermal stress by 80%.
conclusionsHT biophysical screening in 384-well plates was demonstrated to effectively guide the rational design of a high-throughput stability screening study using 96-well plates. This platform enables the identification of a high concentration formulation within seven weeks within the first two phases of study that strategically balance stability with solution properties, thus achieving a rapid development of HCPF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39824982What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.