Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39824980›Full record

ReviewJournal of public health policy2025

Gambling advertising regulation in Ghana: what do we know and where to next?

Emmanuel Badu, Gemma Crawford, Jonathan Hallett, Justine E Leavy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of public health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emmanuel BaduCollaboration for Evidence Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia. emmanuel.badu@curtin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7054-3658
Gemma CrawfordCollaboration for Evidence Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Jonathan HallettCollaboration for Evidence Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Justine E LeavyCollaboration for Evidence Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Ghana and many other sub-Saharan African countries gambling advertising has become pervasive due to weak regulations that allow gambling operators to zealously promote their products as a risk-free way to make money. In this commentary, we provide a public health perspective based on document analysis of the Ghana Gaming Commission's guidelines on advertisements, and recommendations for strengthening Ghana's gambling regulatory environment. With the industry intensifying its focus on new markets to grow and sustain profits, and new global players entering Ghana's market, the competition for market share will most likely intensify with an associated and aggressive increase in gambling advertising. Accordingly, a strengthened gambling advertising regulation underpinned by public health principles is required to restrict advertising across all forms of media and regulate advertising content. The next step for public health action should focus on advocating for new gambling advertising regulations and a review of the Gaming (gambling) Act.

Indexed as

AdvertisingGamblingGovernment RegulationGhanaHumansPublic HealthAdvertisingBettingCommercial determinantsGamblingGhanaSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID39824980
PMCPMC12119331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.