ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparing the effects of Mycozin and Clotrimazole 1% creams on vaginal candidiasis: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intravaginal Formulation Strategies for Vaginal Disorders: Optimizing Phytochemical and Biological Preparations-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clotrimazole 1% and Mycozin vaginal cream have been reported to be effective in relieving the symptoms of vulvovaginitis caused by Candida. The resistance to azole compounds, and the side effects of chemical drugs have been reported following azole therapy. It was hypothesized that Mycozin is at least as effective as Clotrimazole in treating vaginal candidiasis. This equivalent, triple-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 126 patients who complained of vaginal itching referred to Al-Zahra Teaching Hospital, Tabriz, Iran between September 2023 and May 2024. Participants were divided into two groups, i.e., Mycozin (n = 64) and Clotrimazole 1% (n = 62), using the block randomization method. The patient's complaints, clinical signs, the pH and culture of the secretions was recorded before and after treatment. The patient's improvement, level of satisfaction, and side effects were recorded. The data were analyzed using Pearson chi-square test, ANCOVA, and Mann-Whitney U test. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the mean pH (Adjusted mean difference: 0.01; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.20 to 0.21, P = 0.965), and microscopic evaluation (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.61; 95% CI; 0.28 to 1.36, P = 0.230). After the treatment the frequency of itching in the Clotrimazole group (N = 13; 22.0%) was lower than that of the Mycozin group (N = 26; 43.3%) (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.82; P = 0.013). There was no statistically significant difference in other symptoms and signs before and after the treatment (P > 0.05). Also, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the level of satisfaction (P = 0.056) and patient improvement (P = 0.074). The side effects of treatment with Mycozin and Clotrimazole were observed in eleven and five patients, respectively. Considering the efficacy of Mycozin vaginal cream in eliminating most of the symptoms and signs associated with vaginal candidiasis and its positive effect in negating the results of culture, it can be used as a suitable alternative in the treatment of vaginal candidiasis in patients interested in herbal medicines and resistant to azole compounds.Trial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT): IRCT20120718010324N77. Date of registration: 20/05/2023; URL: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/user/trial/68718/view ; Date of first registration: 31/05/2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.