Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39824956›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Advanced microgrid optimization using price-elastic demand response and greedy rat swarm optimization for economic and environmental efficiency.

Arvind R Singh, Bishwajit Dey, Mohit Bajaj, Sahil Kadiwala, Rangu Seshu Kumar, Soham Dutta, Ievgen Zaitsev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arvind R SinghSchool of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering, Hanjiang Normal University, Shiyan, China.
Bishwajit DeyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Manipal University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Mohit BajajDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, 248002, India. mohitbajajphd@gmail.com.
Sahil KadiwalaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Adani Institute of Infrastructure Engineering, Ahmedabad, 382421, Gujarat, India.
Rangu Seshu KumarDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Vignan's Foundation for Science, Technology and Research (Deemed to be University), Vadlamudi, Guntur, India. seshumouni@gmail.com.
Soham DuttaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Ievgen ZaitsevDepartment of Theoretical Electrical Engineering and Diagnostics of Electrical Equipment, Institute of Electrodynamics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Beresteyskiy, 56, Kyiv-57, Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine. zaitsev@i.ua.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, a comprehensive energy management framework for microgrids that incorporates price-based demand response programs (DRPs) and leverages an advanced optimization method-Greedy Rat Swarm Optimizer (GRSO) is proposed. The primary objective is to minimize the generation cost and environmental impact of microgrid systems by effectively scheduling distributed energy resources (DERs), including renewable energy sources (RES) such as solar and wind, alongside fossil-fuel-based generators. Four distinct demand response models-exponential, hyperbolic, logarithmic, and critical peak pricing (CPP)-are developed, each reflecting a different price elasticity of demand. These models are integrated with a flexible elasticity matrix to assess the dynamic consumer response to fluctuating electricity prices. The study evaluates four operational scenarios, focusing on grid participation, DER utilization, and the impact of real-time pricing (RTP), time of use (TOU), and critical peak pricing strategies. Quantitative results demonstrate the significant cost-saving potential of integrating DRPs with microgrid operations. In the optimal scenario, the GRSO achieved a minimum generation cost of 882¥ for the base load profile. Further, when critical peak pricing (CPP) was applied, the generation cost was reduced to 746¥, representing a 15.4% reduction. For a scenario where the grid's participation was limited, the logarithmic-based demand response model decreased the generation cost to 817¥, while full grid interaction led to higher cost reductions. Additionally, our results show a significant reduction in peak load, with load factor improvements of up to 87.7% across the studied demand profiles. Furthermore, limiting the grid's upstream power capacity to 30 kW resulted in a 7% increase in generation cost across all cases, confirming the importance of grid participation in reducing operational costs. The GRSO algorithm outperformed traditional metaheuristics in terms of both execution time and convergence, making it a viable solution for real-time microgrid optimization. In conclusion, the proposed GRSO-based framework provides an efficient approach for microgrid cost minimization, achieving up to a 15.4% reduction in operational costs and notable environmental benefits by reducing emissions. This study highlights the importance of dynamic demand response strategies and grid participation for sustainable and cost-effective microgrid management.

Indexed as

Cost minimizationDemand response programsDistributed energy resourcesEnvironmental efficiencyGreedy rat Swarm OptimizerMicrogrid optimizationPrice elasticityRenewable energy integration

Identifiers

PMID39824956
PMCPMC11742691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.