ArticlePediatric research2025
Outcome prediction for late-onset sepsis after premature birth.
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur aim was to develop a quantitative model for immediately estimating the risk of death and/or brain injury in late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants, based on objective and measurable data available at the time sepsis is first suspected (i.e., time of blood culture collection).
methodsRetrospective study on neonates ≤36 weeks' gestation with a positive blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid culture after 72 hours from birth.
resultsAmong 3217 preterm live births, 94 cases were included (median gestational age 26.5 weeks' IQR 25.0;28.0), of whom 26 (27.7%) had poor outcomes (17 death; 9 brain injuries). Infants with poor outcomes showed lower postnatal age (11.5 vs 12.5 days, p < 0.001), lower mean blood pressure (30.5 vs 43 mmHg, p < 0.001) and higher lactate levels (4.4 vs 1.5 mmol/l, p < 0.001). Our multivariable model showed good discrimination and calibration (c statistic=0.8618, Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.8532), stratifying the population into 3 groups: low-risk (sensitivity 97%, specificity 52%), middle-risk, and high-risk (sensitivity 77%, specificity 80%).
conclusionThis predictive model performs well as a practical and easy-to-use tool to help clinicians early identify the sickest neonates who may benefit from timely and aggressive support (e.g., central line, haemodynamic assessment) and close monitoring (e.g., 1:1 nursing assignment, frequent reassessments). IMPACT: We lack data to early identify the severity of neonatal late-onset sepsis in preterm infants. Delay in treatment contributes to poor prognosis. We developed a model for early prediction of poor outcomes (mortality and brain injuries). The model utilizes immediately available and measurable data at the time sepsis is first suspected. This can help clinicians in tailoring management based on individual risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39824936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.