Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39824920›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Study on influencing factors and prevention measures of coal-rock-gas compound dynamic disaster in deep coal mine mining.

Xu Wang, Chenglin Tian, Qingbiao Wang, Zhenyue Shi, Yong Sun, Keyong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xu WangCollege of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Taian, 271019, Shandong, China.
Chenglin TianCollege of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Taian, 271019, Shandong, China. skdtcl@126.com.
Qingbiao WangCollege of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Taian, 271019, Shandong, China.
Zhenyue ShiCollege of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Taian, 271019, Shandong, China.
Yong SunCollege of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Taian, 271019, Shandong, China. skd996768@sdust.edu.cn.
Keyong WangCollege of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Taian, 271019, Shandong, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52278359Project funded by open fund of state key laboratory of coal mine disaster dynamics and control 2011DA105287-FW202203Qingdao postdoctoral funding program QDBSH20230202074Shandong Provincial Postdoctoral Science Foundation SDCX-ZG-202400203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because coal seam mining with high geostress and high gas pressure is prone to coal-rock-gas compound dynamic disasters, a disaster energy equation considering the influence of roof elastic energy is established, and a disaster energy criterion considering the influence of roof elastic energy is derived and introduced into COMSOL software to conduct numerical simulations of coal seam mining under different geostress and gas pressures. The study revealed that the increase of ground stress reduces the gas pressure required for disaster occurrence. When the gas pressure reaches a certain value, the disaster will occur even if the ground stress is very small. When the ground stress and gas pressure are very low, by changing the magnitude of ground stress or gas pressure, outburst, rockburst and coal‒rock‒gas composite dynamic disasters can transform into each other. As the depth of the excavated coal seam increases, the geostress‒gas pressure increases from 15‒0.5 MPa to 20‒0.74 MPa and 25‒1 MPa, the peak stress and peak gas pressure can reach maximum values of 39.61 MPa and 1.11 MPa, respectively, the difference between the elastic energy of the coal rock body and the expansion energy of the gas is not large, and the energy criterion is greater than 1 and increasing, which indicates that the occurrence of a compound dynamic disaster and the degree of hazard gradually increase. The high-pressure water jet slit technology can increase the average gas extraction volume by 3.6 times, the peak stress is transferred from 7 m away from the coal wall to 10 m, and the peak stress is transferred to the deep coal wall, which can effectively reduce the stress in the coal rock mass and the gas pressure in the coal seam.

Indexed as

Coal–rock–gas compound dynamic disasterElastic energy of the roof rockGas pressuresGeostressHigh pressure water jet

Identifiers

PMID39824920
PMCPMC11742419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.