ArticleScientific reports2025
Probabilistic assessment of the cumulative risk from dietary heavy metal exposure in Chongqing, China using a hazard-driven approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biodegradable Hydrogels for PbGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Minimizing Metal(loid) Risks Through Safe Fish Cooking Techniques: Insights into Toxicity Mechanisms.Biological trace element research · 2026Review
- A probabilistic assessment of dietary heavy metal exposure and its temporal trends in Chongqing China from 2012 to 2022.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrated chemical and radiological risk assessment of livestock products from the Abai region adjacent to the former Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site, Kazakhstan.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Compounding hazards posed by wildfires, flooding, and resource extraction: Assessing multimedia metal(loid) exposures and risk in rural, southwestern U.S. Populations.Environment international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cumulative risk assessment is significant for evaluating the combined exposure to multiple substances, but its widespread acceptance and application have been limited due to the complexity of clarifying and assessing actual exposure. In this study, we conducted a cumulative risk assessment based on hazard-driven criteria to evaluate the co-exposure to elemental contaminants in the diet of the population in Chongqing Municipality. The cumulative risk was calculated and evaluated using Monte Carlo modeling and the modified Reference Point Index (mRPI) method. Neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity were identified as the main toxic endpoints, and the final evaluation elements included were Pb, Cd, As, and Hg. The results showed that the combined mRPI values for neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, resulting from exposure to the four heavy metals, ranged from 0.922 to 4.835 and 1.306 to 7.031, respectively. Cd and Pb were the primary contributors to nephrotoxicity, while Pb was the main contributor to neurotoxicity. The results indicated that combined dietary exposure to Pb, Cd, As, and Hg may pose risks of neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, with the combined exposure likely amplifying this risk compared to exposure to individual heavy metal elements. mRPI proves to be a more suitable index for cumulative risk assessment using a hazard-driven approach compared to other indexes, as it is derived based on specific studies and endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.