Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39824888›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

How knee muscles and ground reaction forces shape knee buckling and ankle push-off in neuromuscular simulations of human walking.

Alexandra Buchmann, Bernadett Kiss, Alexander Badri-Spröwitz, Daniel Renjewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra BuchmannChair of Applied Mechanics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany. alexandra.buchmann@tum.de.
Bernadett KissDynamic Locomotion Group, Max-Plank-Institute for Intelligent Systems, Stuttgart, 70569, Germany.
Alexander Badri-SpröwitzDynamic Locomotion Group, Max-Plank-Institute for Intelligent Systems, Stuttgart, 70569, Germany.
Daniel RenjewskiChair of Applied Mechanics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, 85748, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ankle push-off is important for efficient, human-like walking, and many prosthetic devices mimic push-off using motors or elastic elements. The knee is extended throughout the stance phase and begins to buckle just before push-off, with timing being crucial. However, the exact mechanisms behind this buckling are still unclear. We use a predictive neuromuscular simulation to investigate whether active muscles are required for knee buckling and to what extent ground reaction forces (GRFs) drive it. In a systematic parameter search, we tested how long the knee muscles vastus (VAS), gastrocnemius (GAS), and hamstrings could be deactivated while maintaining a stable gait with impulsive push-off. VAS deactivation up to 35% of the gait cycle resulted in a dynamic gait with increased ankle peak power. GAS deactivation up to 20% of the gait cycle was detrimental to gait efficiency and showed reduced ankle peak power. At the start of knee buckling, the GRF vector is positioned near the knee joint's neutral axis, assisting in knee flexion. However, this mechanism is likely not enough to drive knee flexion independently. Our findings contribute to the biomechanical understanding of ankle push-off, with applications in prosthetic and bipedal robotic design, and fundamental research on human gait mechanics.

Indexed as

AnkleAnkle JointKneeKnee JointMuscle, SkeletalWalkingBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationGaitHumansAnkle push-offGastrocnemiusHamstringsKneePredictive neuromuscular simulationVastus

Identifiers

PMID39824888
PMCPMC11742656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.