Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39824885›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

DeepLabCut custom-trained model and the refinement function for gait analysis.

Giulia Panconi, Stefano Grasso, Sara Guarducci, Lorenzo Mucchi, Diego Minciacchi, Riccardo Bravi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giulia PanconiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. giulia.panconi@unifi.it.
Stefano GrassoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, SAPIENZA University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sara GuarducciDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo MucchiDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Diego MinciacchiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Riccardo BraviDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. riccardo.bravi@unifi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current gold standard for the study of human movement is the marker-based motion capture system that offers high precision but constrained by costs and controlled environments. Markerless pose estimation systems emerge as ecological alternatives, allowing unobtrusive data acquisition in natural settings. This study compares the performance of two popular markerless systems, OpenPose (OP) and DeepLabCut (DLC), in assessing locomotion. Forty healthy subjects walked along a 5 m walkway equipped with four force platforms and a camera. Gait parameters were obtained using OP "BODY_25" Pre-Trained model (OPPT), DLC "Model Zoo full_human" Pre-Trained model (DLCPT) and DLC Custom-Trained model (DLCCT), then compared with those acquired from the force platforms as reference system. Our results showed that DLCCT outperformed DLCPT and OPPT, highlighting the importance of leveraging DeepLabCut transfer learning to enhance the pose estimation performance with a custom-trained neural networks. Moreover, DLCCT, with the implementation of the DLC refinement function, offers the most promising markerless pose estimation solution for evaluating locomotion. Therefore, our data provide insights into the DLC training and refinement processes required to achieve optimal performance. This study proposes perspectives for clinicians and practitioners seeking accurate low-cost methods for movement assessment beyond laboratory settings.

Indexed as

GaitGait AnalysisAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansLocomotionMaleNeural Networks, ComputerWalkingYoung AdultDeepLabCutDeep learningGait AnalysisOpenPosePose estimationVideo analysis

Identifiers

PMID39824885
PMCPMC11742404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.