Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39824879›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025

Classification of NSCLC subtypes using lung microbiome from resected tissue based on machine learning methods.

Pragya Kashyap, Kalbhavi Vadhi Raj, Jyoti Sharma, Naveen Dutt, Pankaj Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pragya KashyapDepartment of Bioscience & Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Kalbhavi Vadhi RajDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Jyoti SharmaDepartment of Bioscience & Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Naveen DuttDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Pankaj YadavDepartment of Bioscience & Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India. pyadav@iitj.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7160-9209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification of adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) poses significant challenges for cytopathologists, often necessitating clinical tests and biopsies that delay treatment initiation. To address this, we developed a machine learning-based approach utilizing resected lung-tissue microbiome of AC and SCC patients for subtype classification. Differentially enriched taxa were identified using LEfSe, revealing ten potential microbial markers. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was subsequently applied to enhance inter-class separability. Next, benchmarking was performed across six different supervised-classification algorithms viz. logistic-regression, naïve-bayes, random-forest, extreme-gradient-boost (XGBoost), k-nearest neighbor, and deep neural network. Noteworthy, XGBoost, with an accuracy of 76.25%, and AUROC (area-under-receiver-operating-characteristic) of 0.81 with 69% specificity and 76% sensitivity, outperform the other five classification algorithms using LDA-transformed features. Validation on an independent dataset confirmed its robustness with an AUROC of 0.71, with minimal false positives and negatives. This study is the first to classify AC and SCC subtypes using lung-tissue microbiome.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLungLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningMicrobiotaAlgorithmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellDiscriminant AnalysisHumans

Identifiers

PMID39824879
PMCPMC11742043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.