ArticleScientific reports2025
Stability indicating RP-HPLC technique for simultaneous estimation of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir in their new copackaged dosage form for COVID-19 treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RP-HPLC technique was developed and optimized for simultaneous identification and estimation of nirmatrelvir (NIR) and ritonavir (RIT) in their new copackaged tablet. Stability of nirmatrelvir (NIR) was studied after exposure to different five stress conditions; alkali, acid, heat, photo and oxidation degradation. The chromatographic separation was achieved using VDSpher PUR 100 ODS (4.6-mm x 15-mm), 3.5 μm column and mixture of 0.03 M potassium di-hydrogen phosphate buffer pH 4 and acetonitrile (45:55, v/v) as mobile phase. The column temperature was set at 40 °C, flow rate at 1mL/min and UV detection at 215 nm. The NIR and RIT retention times were 3.94 ± 0.08 min and 9.08 ± 0.1 min, respectively. Linear relationship was established in range of (1.5-105 µg/mL) for NIR and (1-70 µg/mL) for RIT with good reproducibility. The found mean percentage recoveries of nirmatrelvir (NIR) and ritonavir (RIT) were 100.03% and 99.85%, respectively. The developed method shows very good sensitivity as the LOQ and LOD were found to be 3.001 & 0.990 µg/mL, respectively for NIR and 2.765 & 0.912 µg/mL, respectively for RIT. The developed approach was validated concerning to ICH guidelines and applied successfully for the simultaneous estimation of NIR and RIT in their new copackaged dosage from. The results of assay using the proposed approach were compared statistically to the results found by applying the published one with good agreement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.