ArticleNature communications2025
Decoding the m
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel biclustering algorithm for mining m6A co-methylation patterns based on beta-binomial distribution and data screening strategy.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Nanopore direct RNA sequencing and the epitranscriptome: Advances in mapping native RNA landscapes.iMeta · 2026Review
- Decoding causal m6A: a bioinformatics roadmap for psychiatric disorders.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Emerging roles of RNA mInternational journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Decoding the RNA Shield: HNRNPC and YTHDF2 Act as Guardians of Neurons in Parkinson's Disease.Neurotoxicity research · 2026Review
- RNA mCell biology and toxicology · 2026Review
- Nanopore direct RNA sequencing for RNA modification analysis: workflow assessment and computational tool benchmarking.Advanced biotechnology · 2026Article
- Systematic evaluation of computational tools for multitype RNA modification detection using nanopore direct RNA sequencing.Nature methods · 2026Article
- RMPore: a comprehensive database of single-molecule RNA modifications detected by Nanopore direct RNA sequencing.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- RNA-guided STAT3 modification fine tunes the epigenetic and epitranscriptomic regulation of CD4 + T helper cell differentiation during non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
- Advances in Detecting RNA Modifications Using Direct RNA Nanopore Sequencing.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Review
- Development of a prognostic model based on m6A readerTranslational cancer research · 2025Article
- [Application progress of single-cell RNA sequencing technology in breast development and related diseases].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Review
- Direct detection of 8-oxo-dG using nanopore sequencing.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Role of MClinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epitranscriptomic modifications, particularly N6-methyladenosine (m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.