ArticleBJGP open2025
Evaluation of the Personality Disorder Positive Outcomes Programme (PDPOP) in general practice: an evaluation.
Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGPs and primary care services have been identified as crucial to the care of people with personality disorder. Individuals living with personality disorder frequently face stigma and difficulties when accessing health care. Primary care staff often describe feeling demoralised, incompetent, hurt, or angry after difficult interactions with patients.
aimTo evaluate the effect of Personality Disorder Positive Outcomes Programme (PDPOP) training delivered to 10 GP practices in 2022-2023. DESIGN &
settingPDPOP is a co-produced training course aimed at all staff within GP practices to help teams, including administrative, reception, and clinical staff, to feel confident and skilled when interacting with patients who may have personality disorder.
methodThe New World Kirkpatrick Model was used to evaluate the training, through questionnaires pre- training, post-training, at follow-up, and semi-structured interviews.
resultsEvaluation found that practice teams were highly satisfied with PDPOP training and found it relevant, engaging, and useful. Results demonstrated that staff felt more confident and skilled when interacting with patients who may have personality disorder through use of the training's core concepts. Increased confidence in managing distress, crisis, and participants' own emotions was associated with reduced impact on staff at interview. Practices also demonstrated action taken post-training to reduce dependency on primary care services.
conclusionBy including lived-experience trainers and introducing core concepts, PDPOP has demonstrated a sustained positive impact on primary care teams. Further expansion of this type of training may help to increase the confidence of healthcare staff in delivering care to patients with personality disorder and similar complex emotional needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.