Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39824528›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025

Intratumoral oncolytic virus OH2 injection in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma: a phase 1/2 trial.

Zhichao Tan, Yan Wu, Zhengfu Fan, Tian Gao, Sijuan Ding, Liang Han, Suxia Luo, Qingxia Fan, Jianhua Shi, Chujie Bai and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Natural and Engineered Cytokines as Cancer Therapeutics.Annual review of cancer biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Zhichao Tan *Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9074-9047
Yan Wu *Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Zhengfu FanDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Tian GaoDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Sijuan DingThe Center Hospital of Yongzhou, Yongzhou, Hunan, China.
Liang HanDepartment of Oncology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Suxia LuoThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Qingxia FanDepartment of Oncology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jianhua ShiDepartment of Oncology, Linyi Cancer Hospital, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Chujie BaiDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Ruifeng XueDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Shu LiDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Lu ZhangDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Xinyu WangDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Ling JiaDepartment of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Lixin ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Binlei LiuWuhan Binhui Biopharmaceutical Co Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jing HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China liujiayong_doc@163.com huangjingwg@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2167-8385
Jiayong LiuDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China liujiayong_doc@163.com huangjingwg@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntratumoral oncolytic herpes simplex virus 2-GM CSF (OH2) injection has shown safety and antitumor efficacy in patients with solid tumors. Here, we examined the safety and efficacy of OH2 as a single agent or in combination with HX008, an NMPA-approved PD-1 inhibitor, in locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma patients.

methodsThis multicenter, phase 1/2 trial enrolled patients with injectable sarcoma lesions, who had failed at least 1 or more lines of standard treatment. Patients were treated with OH2 at three dose levels (10

resultsBetween October 20, 2020 and December 30, 2023, 26 patients were enrolled. Seven patients were treated with single-agent OH2 and 19 with HX008 and OH2 combination. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during the dose escalation. We documented four partial or complete responses in injected lesions, and one partial response in non-injected lesions, which were all from the combination group. Hence, the overall response rate was 0% and 16.7% in the single agent and combination groups, respectively. The duration of response was 3.9-6.5 months. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were fever (n=9). Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were reported in four patients (15.4%). A clear increase in CD8+cell density in the tumor microenvironment was observed in the patients' post-treatment specimens compared with baseline.

conclusionsIntratumoral injection of oncolytic virus OH2 is well tolerable in patients with sarcoma. Further investigation of OH2 with HX008 in select sarcoma subtypes is warranted.

Indexed as

Oncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesSarcomaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisImmune Checkpoint InhibitorImmunotherapyOncolytic virusSolid tumor

Identifiers

PMID39824528
PMCPMC11748782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.