Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39824514›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Intracellular Pocket Conformations Determine Signaling Efficacy through the μ Opioid Receptor.

David A Cooper, Joseph DePaolo-Boisvert, Stanley A Nicholson, Barien Gad, David D L Minh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David A CooperDepartment of Chemistry, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, United States.
Joseph DePaolo-BoisvertDepartment of Chemistry, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, United States.
Stanley A NicholsonDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, United States.
Barien GadDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, United States.
David D L MinhDepartment of Chemistry, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4802-2618

Funding

Entropy for End-Point and FFT-Based Binding Free Energy CalculationsR01GM127712 · NIGMS · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MINH, DAVID DO LE · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been challenging to determine how a ligand that binds to a receptor activates downstream signaling pathways and to predict the strength of signaling. The challenge is compounded by functional selectivity, in which a single ligand binding to a single receptor can activate multiple signaling pathways at different levels. Spectroscopic studies show that in the largest class of cell surface receptors, 7 transmembrane receptors (7TMRs), activation is associated with ligand-induced shifts in the equilibria of intracellular pocket conformations in the absence of transducer proteins. We hypothesized that signaling through the μ opioid receptor, a prototypical 7TMR, is linearly proportional to the equilibrium probability of observing intracellular pocket conformations in the receptor-ligand complex. Here, we show that a machine learning model based on this hypothesis accurately calculates the efficacy of both G protein and β-arrestin-2 signaling. Structural features that the model associates with activation are intracellular pocket expansion, toggle switch rotation, and sodium binding pocket collapse. Distinct pathways are activated by different arrangements of the ligand and sodium binding pockets and the intracellular pocket. While recent work has categorized ligands as active or inactive (or partially active) based on binding affinities to two conformations, our approach accurately computes signaling efficacy along multiple pathways.

Indexed as

Intracellular SpaceReceptors, Opioid, muSignal TransductionBinding SitesHumansLigandsMachine LearningModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationLigandsReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID39824514
PMCPMC11817682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.