Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39824507›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

Online correction of intrafraction motion during volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate radiotherapy using fiducial-based kV imaging: A cohort study quantifying the frequency of shifts and analysis of men at highest risk.

Lucas M Serra, Tianming Wu, Mark C Korpics, Kamil Yenice, Stanley L Liauw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucas M SerraDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Tianming WuDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Mark C KorpicsDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8449-2986
Kamil YeniceDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Stanley L LiauwDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4701-2469

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious methods exist to correct for intrafraction motion (IFM) of the prostate during radiotherapy. We sought to characterize setup corrections in our practice informed by the TrueBeam Advanced imaging package, and analyze factors associated with IFM.

methods132 men received radiation therapy for prostate cancer with a volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. All patients underwent planning CT immediately following transrectal placement of 3 fiducial markers. The most common RT course was 20 fractions (range: 17-44). Triggered kV images were acquired every 15 seconds over 2-3 full arcs using an onboard imaging system. IFM correction was considered when if any two fiducial markers in a single kV image were observed to be outside beyond a 3 mm tolerance margin. A manual 2D/3D match was performed using the fiducial markers from the single triggered kV image to obtain a suggested couch shift. Shift data for three (x, y, z) planes were extracted from the record and verify system and expressed as a single 3-dimensional translation. Shift percent (SP) was defined as the number of instances of an intrafraction correction divided by the total number of fractions for a given patient.

resultsOver 2659 fractions of radiation, IFM was observed and corrected for 582 times across 463 (17%) fractions, and at least one shift was made over the course of treatment in 77% of men. Univariate analysis revealed that larger rectal volume or width, smaller prostate volume, and use of ADT were associated with SP > 20% (p < 0.05). Men with a rectal width >3.6 cm were more likely to have IFM corrected (SP > 20% 47% vs 18%, p = 0.0016). On multivariate analysis, only rectal volume and width were associated with IFM.

conclusionsIn this cohort study, 17% of fractions were interrupted to apply at least one couch shift. Men treated with shorter courses of therapy, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, or men at high risk for IFM (e.g. larger rectal size) may warrant more careful consideration regarding the implications of IFM.

Indexed as

Fiducial MarkersImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedCohort StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageIFMintrafraction motiononboard imagingprostate cancershift correction

Identifiers

PMID39824507
PMCPMC11969104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.