ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Using Rasch analysis to assess the latent construct of the Capacity to Work Index in a Swedish working population sample.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measurements of capacity to work (CTW) in relation to common mental disorders (CMD) are needed to improve research on determinants for maintained work participation (WP). The aim of this study was to assess the construct validity of the Capacity to Work Index (C2WI) in a heterogenous sample of the Swedish working population. Cross-sectional web survey data among Swedish employees (n = 8201) was used. The construct validity was assessed in terms of the unidimensionality of the scale, response categories appropriateness, and the differential item functioning with respect to gender and age. Rasch analysis was used in both the full sample and randomly selected subsets. The Rasch model (RM) was fitted using two versions of the C2WI construct: the original 17-item scale and a 7-item scale. The 17-item scale did not discriminate as required, whereas the 7-item scale demonstrated a better fit to the RM. However, statistically significant χ2 statistics indicated non-invariant item performance across the latent continuum. A third attempt assessed both scales on a subgroup, yielding improved results, but an overall fit to the RM was not achieved. CTW in relation to CMD assessed by the C2WI did not fulfil the requirements for construct validity outlined by the RM. Real-world experiences of CTW are complex and reflect expressions of mental health in diverse work environments. Further studies are required to determine the predictive capacity of C2WI and its individual items in relation to relevant outcomes, such as maintained WP in the working population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.