ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
Characterizing substructure via mixture modeling in large-scale genetic summary statistics.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global multi-ancestry genome-wide analyses identify genes and biological pathways associated with thyroid cancer and benign thyroid diseases.Nature genetics · 2026Pooled it
- CCAFE: Estimating case and control allele frequencies from GWAS summary statistics.HGG advances · 2026Article
- BTS: a scalable Bayesian Tissue Score for prioritizing GWAS variants and their functional contexts across >1000s of omics datasets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic summary data are broadly accessible and highly useful, including for risk prediction, causal inference, fine mapping, and incorporation of external controls. However, collapsing individual-level data into summary data, such as allele frequencies, masks intra- and inter-sample heterogeneity, leading to confounding, reduced power, and bias. Ultimately, unaccounted-for substructure limits summary data usability, especially for understudied or admixed populations. There is a need for methods to enable the harmonization of summary data where the underlying substructure is matched between datasets. Here, we present Summix2, a comprehensive set of methods and software based on a computationally efficient mixture model to enable the harmonization of genetic summary data by estimating and adjusting for substructure. In extensive simulations and application to public data, we show that Summix2 characterizes finer-scale population structure, identifies ascertainment bias, and scans for potential regions of selection due to local substructure deviation. Summix2 increases the robust use of diverse, publicly available summary data, resulting in improved and more equitable research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.