Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39824001›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2025

The effect of the foreign body response on drug elution from subdermal delivery systems.

Simone Capuani, Nathanael Hernandez, Jocelyn Nikita Campa-Carranza, Nicola Di Trani, Takuma Yoshikawa, Marco Farina, Ashley L Joubert, Camden A Caffey, Alessio Simeone, Seo Won Cho and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Therapeutic peptides and proteins: Status and developments in drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Localized inflammasome inhibition mitigates foreign body response to subcutaneous long-acting antiretroviral therapy for HIV.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Smart closed-loop drug delivery systems.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Simone CapuaniDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Nathanael HernandezDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Jocelyn Nikita Campa-CarranzaDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA; School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.
Nicola Di TraniDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Takuma YoshikawaDepartment of Bioengineering and Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marco FarinaDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Ashley L JoubertDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Camden A CaffeyDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Alessio SimeoneDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Seo Won ChoCollege of Medicine Texas A&M University, Bryan, Houston, TX, USA.
Patrick S StaytonDepartment of Bioengineering and Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Corrine Ying Xuan ChuaDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Alessandro GrattoniDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: agrattoni@houstonmethodist.org.

Funding

Ultra-long Acting Transcutaneously Refillable Islatravir Nanofluidic Implant for HIV Pre-ExposureR01AI165372 · NIAID · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GRATTONI, ALESSANDRO · 2022 to 2025
$4.5M
Long-acting multi prevention implant for 2-year contraception and HIV PrEPR01AI167659 · NIAID · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alessandro Grattoni, Patrick S. Stayton · 2023 to 2026
$3.3M
An integrated polymeric carrier for subunit cancer vaccinesR01CA257563 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PUN, SUZIE H., STAYTON, PATRICK S. · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257563NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI165372NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI167659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrasting findings are presented in the literature regarding the influence of foreign body response (FBR) on drug release from implantable drug delivery systems. To this end, here we sought direct evidence of the effect of the fibrotic tissue on subcutaneous drug release from long-acting drug delivery implants. Specifically, we investigated the pharmacokinetic impact of fibrotic encapsulation on a small molecule drug, islatravir (293 Da), and a large protein, IgG (150 kDa), administered via biocompatible implants. First, solid implants fabricated from biocompatible PMMA resin, nylon, and PLA were used to characterize the degree of FBR in rats. Despite initial material-dependent differences in the early FBR phase, the thickness and composition of the fibrotic capsules normalized in the chronic phase of FBR. Ex vivo assessments indicated an increase in the diffusivity of both molecules over time, aligning with a reduction in collagen density within the fibrotic tissue. Subsequently, reservoir-based drug delivery devices, matching the solid implants in size, shape and material, were implanted to study in vivo pharmacokinetics. The study revealed consistent plasma levels of islatravir across different implant materials and a temporary modulation of IgG release from PMMA resin implants during the acute FBR phase. End-point histological analyses confirmed that the localized delivery neither incited inflammation in the surrounding tissue nor did it alter vascularization. This evidence suggests that, while acute FBR may transiently affect the release of larger molecules, in the absence of acute local inflammation, fibrotic encapsulation does not significantly impact the steady-state release of small molecule drugs from long-acting implantable delivery systems.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsForeign-Body ReactionAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDrug ImplantsDrug LiberationImmunoglobulin GMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyBiocompatible MaterialsDrug ImplantsImmunoglobulin GFibrotic capsuleForeign body responseImplantable devicesLong-acting drug deliveryMolecular transportPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID39824001
PMCPMC11852395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.