ArticleBiomaterials2025
The effect of the foreign body response on drug elution from subdermal delivery systems.
Article in Biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic peptides and proteins: Status and developments in drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026Review
- Profiling Localized Immunomodulation and Drug Biodistribution within a Subcutaneous Vascularized Niche for Cell Transplantation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Localized inflammasome inhibition mitigates foreign body response to subcutaneous long-acting antiretroviral therapy for HIV.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026Article
- Generating tolerance through in situ recruitment of regulatory T cells for allogeneic cell transplantation in a bioengineered lymphoid platform.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Smart closed-loop drug delivery systems.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contrasting findings are presented in the literature regarding the influence of foreign body response (FBR) on drug release from implantable drug delivery systems. To this end, here we sought direct evidence of the effect of the fibrotic tissue on subcutaneous drug release from long-acting drug delivery implants. Specifically, we investigated the pharmacokinetic impact of fibrotic encapsulation on a small molecule drug, islatravir (293 Da), and a large protein, IgG (150 kDa), administered via biocompatible implants. First, solid implants fabricated from biocompatible PMMA resin, nylon, and PLA were used to characterize the degree of FBR in rats. Despite initial material-dependent differences in the early FBR phase, the thickness and composition of the fibrotic capsules normalized in the chronic phase of FBR. Ex vivo assessments indicated an increase in the diffusivity of both molecules over time, aligning with a reduction in collagen density within the fibrotic tissue. Subsequently, reservoir-based drug delivery devices, matching the solid implants in size, shape and material, were implanted to study in vivo pharmacokinetics. The study revealed consistent plasma levels of islatravir across different implant materials and a temporary modulation of IgG release from PMMA resin implants during the acute FBR phase. End-point histological analyses confirmed that the localized delivery neither incited inflammation in the surrounding tissue nor did it alter vascularization. This evidence suggests that, while acute FBR may transiently affect the release of larger molecules, in the absence of acute local inflammation, fibrotic encapsulation does not significantly impact the steady-state release of small molecule drugs from long-acting implantable delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.