ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2025
A comparative analysis of image harmonization techniques in mitigating differences in CT acquisition and reconstruction.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT texture phantom dataset with paired image quality assessments for quantitative imaging.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Improving Deep Learning Based Lung Nodule Classification Through Optimized Adaptive Intensity Correction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of CT harmonization in longitudinal radiomics for NSCLC immunotherapy response prediction.Computers in biology and medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of CT Intensity and Contrast Variability on Deep-Learning-Based Lung-Nodule Detection: A Systematic Review of Preprocessing and Harmonization Strategies (2020-2025).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based MRI model for predicting P53-mutated hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- No Reproducibility, No Progress: Rethinking CT Benchmarking.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.