Trial reportJCO precision oncology2025
Artificial Intelligence-Powered Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 and Tumor Microenvironment Analysis in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Amplified Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of Phase II TRIUMPH Trial.
Trial report in JCO precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Quantification and Clinical Outcomes in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Biliary Tract Cancer Treated With Trastuzumab Plus Folinic Acid, Fluorouracil, and Oxaliplatin.JCO precision oncology · 2025Trial
- Overcoming Resistance to Anti-EGFR Therapies: Mechanisms of Cetuximab and Panitumumab Resistance and Emerging Combination Strategies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multi-omics and artificial intelligence for precision drug discovery and potential clinical applications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Digital Pathology and the AI-Based Quantification of the Tumor Microenvironment in Gastrointestinal Cancer: From Tumor Budding and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes to Tertiary Lymphoid Structures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The pre-metastatic niche: mechanisms, heterogeneity, and therapeutic opportunities.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Decoding Immunotherapy Response in Colorectal Cancer: Translational Insights Beyond MSI.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
- AI-driven pathology in esophageal cancer: from early screening to precision prognostics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical relevance of circulating tumor DNA in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer: a collaborative study of a phase Ib trial of dual HER2 and PD-1 targeted therapy (Ni-High).Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies have shown promise in treating MATERIALS AND
methodsAI-powered HER2 quantification continuous score (QCS) and tumor microenvironment (TME) analysis were applied to the prescreening cohort (n = 143) and the TRIUMPH cohort (n = 30). AI analyzers determined the proportions of tumor cells (TCs) with HER2 staining intensity and the densities of various cells in TME, examining their associations with clinical outcomes of TP.
resultsThe AI-powered HER2 QCS for HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) achieved an accuracy of 86.7% against pathologist evaluations, with a 100% accuracy for HER2 IHC 3+ patients. Patients with ≥50% of TCs showing HER2 3+ staining intensity (AI-H3-high) exhibited significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS; median PFS, 4.4
conclusionAI-powered HER2 QCS and TME analysis demonstrated potential in enhancing treatment response predictions in patients with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.