ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Computational Insights into Membrane Disruption by Cell-Penetrating Peptides.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding cell-penetrating peptide mechanisms using computational electrophysiology simulations.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Enhancing anticancer peptide discovery: A fusion-centric framework with conditional diffusion for prediction and generation.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Advances in molecular dynamics approaches for investigating cell-penetrating peptides.Biophysical reviews · 2026Review
- PEPAD: A Promising Therapeutic Approach for the Treatment of Murine Melanoma (B16F10-Nex2).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) can translocate into cells without inducing cytotoxicity. The internalization process implies several steps at different time scales ranging from microseconds to minutes. We combine adaptive Steered Molecular Dynamics (aSMD) with conventional Molecular Dynamics (cMD) to observe nonequilibrium and equilibrium states to study the early mechanisms of peptide-bilayer interaction leading to CPPs internalization. We define three membrane compositions representing bilayer sections, neutral lipids (i.e., upper leaflet), neutral lipids with cholesterol (i.e., hydrophobic core), and neutral/negatively charged lipids with cholesterol (i.e., lower leaflet) to study the energy barriers and disruption mechanisms of Arg9, MAP, and TP2, representing cationic, amphiphilic, and hydrophobic CPPs, respectively. Cholesterol and negatively charged lipids increase the energetic barriers for the peptide-bilayer crossing. TP2 interacts with the bilayer by hydrophobic insertion, while Arg9 disrupts the bilayer by forming transient or stable pores. MAP has shown both behaviors. Collectively, these findings underscore the significance of innovative computational approaches in studying membrane-disruptive peptides and, more specifically, in harnessing their potential for cell penetration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.