ArticlePloS one2025
Flexible and modular latent transition analysis-A tutorial using R.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Latent transition analysis (LTA) is a useful statistical modelling approach for describe transitions between latent classes over time. LTA may be characterized in terms of prevalence at each time point and through transition probabilities over time. Investigating predictors of these transitions is often of key interest. Currently, LTA can mostly be carried out using commercial and specialized software and only to some limited extent by means of open source statistical software. This tutorial demonstrates a flexible and modular approach for LTA, providing a powerful alternative using R through a combination latent class analysis and multiple logistic regression models. This approach has several advantages from a modelling perspective, as demonstrated through revisiting a previously conducted LTA, published in PLoS ONE recently. In short, results were very similar to the original analysis using commercial software although some additional novel results were also obtained. The proposed alternative approach offers more options in terms of choice of effect measures, model assumptions such as hierarchical structures and covariate adjustment, and differential handling of missing data. R code snippets are provided in the tutorial. A detailed accompanying script is also provided for full reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.