Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39823448›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Exploring the impact of grazing on fecal and soil microbiome dynamics in small ruminants in organic crop-livestock integration systems.

Sejin Cheong, Kimberly Aguirre-Siliezar, Sequoia R Williams, Amélie C M Gaudin, Paulo Pagliari, Michele T Jay-Russell, Roselle Busch, Elizabeth A Maga, Alda F A Pires

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sejin CheongDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8697-2094
Kimberly Aguirre-SiliezarDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Sequoia R WilliamsDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Amélie C M GaudinDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Paulo PagliariDepartment of Soil, Water and Climate, College of Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5037-0531
Michele T Jay-RussellWestern Center for Food Safety, University of California-Davis, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Roselle BuschDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Elizabeth A MagaDepartment of Animal Science, University of California-Davis, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Alda F A PiresDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9326-0298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In integrated crop-livestock systems, livestock graze on cover crops and deposit raw manure onto fields to improve soil health and fertility. However, enteric pathogens shed by grazing animals may be associated with foodborne pathogen contamination of produce influenced by fecal-soil microbial interactions. We analyzed 300 fecal samples (148 from sheep and 152 from goats) and 415 soil samples (272 from California and 143 from Minnesota) to investigate the effects of grazing and the presence of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) or generic E. coli (gEc) in fecal and soil microbiomes. We collected samples from field trials of three treatments (fallow, a cover crop without grazing (non-graze CC), and a cover crop with grazing (graze CC)) grazed by sheep or goats between 2020 and 2022. No significant differences in non-O157 STEC prevalence were found between pre- and post-grazing fecal samples in either sheep or goats. However, gEc was more prevalent in graze CC soils compared to fallow or non-graze CC soils. Alpha diversity was influenced by the species of grazing animals and the region, as sheep fecal samples and soil from the California trials had greater alpha diversity than goat fecal samples and soil from the Minnesota trials. Beta diversity in sheep fecal samples differed by the presence or absence of non-O157 STEC, while in goat fecal samples, it differed between pre- and post-grazing events. Actinobacteria was negatively associated with non-O157 STEC presence in sheep fecal samples and decreased in post-grazing goat fecal samples. Grazing did not significantly affect soil microbial diversity or composition, and no interaction was observed between post-grazing fecal samples and the graze CC soil. The results suggest that soil contamination by foodborne pathogens and microbiome dynamics in ICLS are influenced by grazing animal species and regional factors, with interactions between fecal and soil microbial communities having minimal impact.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalFecesHerbivoryLivestockMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyAnimalsCaliforniaGoatsMinnesotaSheepShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliSoilSoil

Identifiers

PMID39823448
PMCPMC11741640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.