ArticlePloS one2025
Establishing thresholds for swing transparency at the knee during gait to inform exoskeleton design.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knee exoskeletons have been developed to assist, stabilize, or improve human movement or recovery. However, exoskeleton designers must implement transparency (i.e., get out of the way) modes during the swing phase of locomotor tasks to avoid impeding movement. The problem is that it is not understood how sensitive people are to small knee torques or what level of knee impedance is acceptable (sufficiently transparent) during swing phase. Here, we (i) characterized the biomechanical consequences of knee stiffness and damping during swing, and (ii) leveraged user perceptions of being impeded and toe clearance to define transparency thresholds, below which the participants were sufficiently unimpeded during the swing phase of gait. We conducted a series of human subject experiments that involved walking and stair ascent/descent while wearing a modified knee brace with five stiffness values ranging from 0 to 4 Nm/rad and five damping values ranging from 0 to 0.77 Nm/rad/s. We measured changes to lower limb kinematics, knee flexor muscle activity, and participants' perception of being impeded during swing. Kinematics, muscle activity, and perceived impedance all changed in response to added stiffness and damping. For stiffness, we found the median transparency thresholds for walking and stairs to be 1.76 Nm/rad and 2.95 Nm/rad, respectively, which corresponds to peak knee moments during swing of around 2.3 and 5 Nm. For damping, we found the median transparency threshold for walking and stairs to be about the same, 0.29 Nm/rad/s, which corresponds to peak knee moments during swing of around 2.3 Nm. These values provide useful benchmarks for defining quantitative design requirements for knee exoskeletons intended for locomotor activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.