ArticlePLOS global public health2025
The 30-year evolution of oral cholera vaccines: A case study of a collaborative network alternative innovation model.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The forgotten foe returns: cholera's warning to a complacent world demanding urgent action.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Development of DuoChol, a Thermostable Inactivated Whole-Cell/B-Subunit Oral Cholera Vaccine in Enteric Capsule.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Strategies for achieving a healthy oral cholera vaccine market: Model-enabled scenario exploration of supply and demand dynamics.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Regulatory Strengthening as a Pillar of Health System Resilience for Sustainable Immunization.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Uptake likelihood assessment of oral cholera vaccine capsules: insights from stakeholder consultations in five countries.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholera outbreaks have been rapidly increasing around the world. While long-term cholera prevention and control measures rely on improvements in water, sanitation, and hygiene, oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) are used for prevention and control in the short-to-medium term. OCVs lack the market incentives available in other more profitable disease areas. The development of OCVs was made possible through an alternative innovation model, which sustained innovation across multiple generations of the product for more than three decades. To examine how this alternative innovation model worked, we conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders related to the development of several OCVs, including "Dukoral", "Shanchol", and "Euvichol-Plus", as well as additional cholera vaccines currently under development. Interview data was analyzed thematically according to the resources used by organizations (including funding, knowledge, relationships, and manufacturing), and the practices they implemented during each stage of the R&D process (including knowledge management and intellectual property strategies, approaches to transparency, and global access strategies). Next, we created participatory network maps to illustrate the structure of the relationships between stakeholders and how these evolved over time. We found that a core group of stakeholders were able to influence policies to promote the use of OCVs, and successfully develop, finance, and obtain WHO Prequalification for safe, effective, and affordable OCVs for global procurement and distribution. The evolution of OCVs demonstrates how a collaborative network innovation model can successfully develop new pharmaceutical products that are affordable and well-suited for use in context. This model could be applied to other areas of pharmaceutical innovation, such as pandemic preparedness, for more equitable outcomes for global public health.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.