Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39823337›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

A metagenomic perspective on the microbial prokaryotic genome census.

Dongying Wu, Rekha Seshadri, Nikos C Kyrpides, Natalia N Ivanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  12. Exploring theFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microorganisms thriving together as communities.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dongying WuDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4167-2212
Rekha SeshadriDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-2900
Nikos C KyrpidesDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6131-0462
Natalia N IvanovaDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5802-9485

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following 30 years of sequencing, we assessed the phylogenetic diversity (PD) of >1.5 million microbial genomes in public databases, including metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of uncultivated microbes. As compared to the vast diversity uncovered by metagenomic sequences, cultivated taxa account for a modest portion of the overall diversity, 9.73% in bacteria and 6.55% in archaea, while MAGs contribute 48.54% and 57.05%, respectively. Therefore, a substantial fraction of bacterial (41.73%) and archaeal PD (36.39%) still lacks any genomic representation. This unrepresented diversity manifests primarily at lower taxonomic ranks, exemplified by 134,966 species identified in 18,087 metagenomic samples. Our study exposes diversity hotspots in freshwater, marine subsurface, sediment, soil, and other environments, whereas human samples yielded minimal novelty within the context of existing datasets. These results offer a roadmap for future genome recovery efforts, delineating uncaptured taxa in underexplored environments and underscoring the necessity for renewed isolation and sequencing.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialMetagenomeMetagenomicsBiodiversityHumansPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID39823337
PMCPMC11740963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.