Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39823284›Full record

ReviewPhysical therapy2025

Taking the Next Step in Neurologic Rehabilitation: Contributions of Intensity and Variability of Stepping Tasks During Locomotor Training.

T George Hornby, Jennifer Moore, Carey L Holleran, Christopher E Henderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T George HornbyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indianapolis, IN 46254, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3147-3818
Jennifer MooreInstitute for Knowledge Translation, Carmel, IN 46082, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6968-0679
Carey L HolleranDivision of Physical Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7740-6250
Christopher E HendersonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indianapolis, IN 46254, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9464-2789

Funding

High-Intensity, dynamic-stability gait training in people with multiple sclerosisR01HD107145 · NICHD · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI Thomas George Hornby, BRIAN D SCHMIT · 2022 to 2026
$2.8M
Locomotor Recovery and Compensation Post-strokeR01NS118009 · NINDS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Thomas George Hornby · 2021 to 2026
$2.0M
Variable Intensive Early Walking post-Stroke (VIEWS)R01HD108622 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Thomas George Hornby · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
National Institute of Health 1R01HD107145NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD107145NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD108622NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research over the past 20 years indicates the amount of task-specific walking practice provided to individuals with stroke, brain injury, or incomplete spinal cord injury can strongly influence walking recovery. However, more recent data suggest that attention toward 2 other training parameters, including the intensity and variability of walking practice, may maximize walking recovery and facilitate gains in non-walking outcomes. The combination of these training parameters represents a stark contrast from traditional strategies, and confusion regarding the potential benefits and perceived risks may limit their implementation in clinical practice. The purpose of this perspective is to delineate the evidence regarding the contributions of intensity and variability of locomotor training to improve mobility outcomes in individuals with acute-onset brain and spinal cord injury. The rationale and evidence supporting the utility of these training parameters in controlled laboratory settings is first described by integrating concepts in the field of neuroscience, motor learning, biomechanics, and exercise physiology into a rehabilitation intervention. Subsequently, the evidence supporting the efficacy of this paradigm is addressed, including discussions of some of the misconceptions regarding perceived negative consequences of these strategies in an effort to mitigate common clinical concerns. Finally, the utility of these strategies implemented during inpatient rehabilitation is delineated to facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of the feasibility and potential benefits early following neurologic injury. A greater understanding of how and why to integrate higher intensity, variable stepping practice will support therapists to take the next step to maximize mobility in the patients they serve.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesExercise TherapyNeurological RehabilitationSpinal Cord InjuriesStroke RehabilitationWalkingBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansRecovery of FunctionLocomotionSpinal Cord InjuryStrokeWalking Recovery

Identifiers

PMID39823284
PMCPMC12034094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.