Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39823275›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2025

Resolving spatially distinct phytohormone response zones in Arabidopsis thaliana roots colonized by Fusarium oxysporum.

Jacob Calabria, Liu Wang, Madlen I Rast-Somssich, Hsiang-Wen Chen, Michelle Watt, Staffan Persson, Tonni Grube Andersen, Alexander Idnurm, Marc Somssich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Spatial organization of plant defense at the infection front.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jacob CalabriaPlant-Fusarium Interactions Research Team, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-8735-2470
Liu WangPlant-Fusarium Interactions Research Team, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Madlen I Rast-SomssichCrop Root Physiology Lab, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Hsiang-Wen ChenPlant-Fusarium Interactions Research Team, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Michelle WattCrop Root Physiology Lab, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7843-0957
Staffan PerssonPlant Cell Biology Lab, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6377-5132
Tonni Grube AndersenMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Alexander IdnurmMycology Laboratory, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5995-7040
Marc SomssichPlant-Fusarium Interactions Research Team, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5092-6168

Funding

Australian Research Council DE200101560Horizon Europe Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions fellowship 101107472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), and salicylic acid (SA) are the three major phytohormones coordinating plant defense responses, and all three are implicated in the defense against the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum. However, their distinct modes of action and possible interactions remain unknown, in part because all spatial information on their activity is lacking. Here, we set out to probe this spatial aspect of plant immunity by using live microscopy with newly developed fluorescence-based transcriptional reporter lines. We have created a GreenGate vector collection of Plant Immune system Promoters (GG-PIPs) that allow us to image local activation of immune pathways with single-cell resolution. Using this system, we demonstrated that SA and JA act spatially separately from each other in distinct sets of root cells neighboring the fungal colonization site, while ET contributed to both sets. SA and ET induced the hypersensitive response as a first line of defense, while JA and ET governed active defense against the pathogen in a separate, second line of defense. Such an approach to resolve plant immune responses on an individual cell level has been lacking, and this work demonstrates that this microscopy-based approach can contribute to understanding plant immune responses in detail.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisFusariumPlant DiseasesPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant RootsCyclopentanesEthylenesGene Expression Regulation, PlantOxylipinsPlant ImmunitySalicylic AcidCyclopentanesethyleneEthylenesjasmonic acidOxylipinsPlant Growth RegulatorsSalicylic AcidArabidopsis thalianaethyleneFo5176Fusarium oxysporumjasmonic acidphytohormonesplant immunityplant–microbe interactionssalicylic acidspatial immunity

Identifiers

PMID39823275
PMCPMC12066115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.