Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39823252›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025

Incidence and predictors of weaning failure from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Angela Dettling, Caroline Kellner, Jonas Sundermeyer, Benedikt N Beer, Lisa Besch, Letizia Fausta Bertoldi, Stefan Blankenberg, Jeroen Dauw, Dennis Eckner, Ingo Eitel and 29 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. SCAI Door to Lactate Clearance (SCAI DLC) Cardiogenic Shock Initiative: Definition, Hypothesis, and Call to Action.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Angela DettlingDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0992-0236
Caroline KellnerDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Jonas SundermeyerDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Benedikt N BeerDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Lisa BeschDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Letizia Fausta BertoldiCardio Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.
Stefan BlankenbergDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Jeroen DauwCariovascular Center Aalst, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
Dennis EcknerDepartment of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany.
Ingo EitelGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias GrafGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.
Patrick HornDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Joanna Jozwiak-NozdrzykowskaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany.
Paulus KirchhofDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan KlugeUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Jannis KraisDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Dirk von LewinskiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Axel LinkeDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany.
Peter LuedikeDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Enzo LüsebrinkDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter NordbeckDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Federico PappalardoDepartment Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Matthias PauschingerDepartment of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany.
Alastair ProudfootDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Tienush RassafDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Hermann ReichenspurnerGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.
Can Martin SagDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Clemens SchererDepartment of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
P Christian SchulzeDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Robert H G SchwingerMedizinische Klinik II, Kliniken Nordoberpfalz AG, Weiden, Germany.
Carsten SkurkDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, DHZC Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Marek SramkoDepartment of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic.
Guido TavazziDepartment of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia Italy; Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Holger ThieleDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany.
Nuccia MoriciIRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi, ONLUS, Santa Maria Nascente, Milan, Italy.
Ephraim B WinzerDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany.
Dirk WestermannDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany.
Benedikt Schrage *Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Norman Mangner *Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to investigate incidence and predictors of weaning failure and in-hospital death after successful weaning from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). METHODS AND

resultsOverall, 685 patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO from 23 tertiary care centres in 7 countries were analysed (median age 57 [interquartile range 49-66] years, 542 [79.1%] male, median lactate 7.6 [interquartile range 4.1-12.7] mmol/L). The cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction in 438 (63.9%) patients, and 431 (62.9%) patients presented with cardiac arrest. A total of 410 patients (59.9%) were successfully weaned from VA-ECMO, whereas in 275 patients (40.1%) weaning failed (i.e. patients died on or within 48 h after VA-ECMO support). Of the successfully weaned patients, 150 (36.6%) died before hospital discharge. On multivariable logistic regression, predictors for both patient groups varied: age (per 10 years, odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.76; p < 0.001) and cardiac arrest before VA-ECMO implantation (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.01-2.64; p = 0.04) were associated with weaning failure, whereas lactate clearance within 24 h after VA-ECMO initiation was associated with successful weaning (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.1-0.44; p < 0.001). In-hospital death after successful weaning was more likely with higher age (per 10 years, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.24-1.97; p < 0.001), renal replacement therapy (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.4-4.68; p = 0.002) and bleeding events (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.4-6.14; p = 0.004).

conclusionWeaning from VA-ECMO fails in 40% of patients treated with VA-ECMO for CS. When successful, survival after VA-ECMO weaning mostly depends on age and the incidence of device- and shock-related complications.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationShock, CardiogenicAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment FailureCardiogenic shockMechanical circulatory supportMortalityPredictorsVeno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenationWeaning

Identifiers

PMID39823252
PMCPMC12103957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.