ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2025
Diagnostic Power of MicroRNAs in Melanoma: Integrating Machine Learning for Enhanced Accuracy and Pathway Analysis.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiple roles of MicroRNAs in melanoma: biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment prediction.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- MicroRNA bioinformatics in precision oncology: an integrated pipeline from NGS to AI-based target discovery.Journal of applied genetics · 2025Review
- DDX18 promotes growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma via activating EMT and MAPK signaling.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study identifies microRNAs (miRNAs) with significant discriminatory power in distinguishing melanoma from nevus, notably hsa-miR-26a and hsa-miR-211, which have exhibited diagnostic potential with accuracy of 81% and 78% respectively. To enhance diagnostic accuracy, we integrated miRNAs into various machine-learning (ML) models. Incorporating miRNAs with AUC scores above 0.70 significantly improved diagnostic accuracy to 94%, with a sensitivity of 91%. These findings underscore the potential of ML models to leverage miRNA data for enhanced melanoma diagnosis. Additionally, using the miRNet tool, we constructed a network of miRNA-miRNA interactions, revealing 170 key genes in melanoma pathophysiology. Protein-protein interaction network analysis via Cytoscape identified hub genes including MYC, BRCA1, JUN, AURKB, CDKN2A, DDX5, MAPK14, DDX3X, DDX6, FOXM1 and GSK3B. The identification of hub genes and their interactions with miRNAs enhances our understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving melanoma. Pathway enrichment analyses highlighted key pathways associated with differentially expressed miRNAs, including the PI3K/AKT, TGF-beta signalling pathway and cell cycle regulation. These pathways are implicated in melanoma development and progression, reinforcing the significance of our findings. The functional enrichment of miRNAs suggests their critical role in modulating essential pathways in melanoma, suggesting their potential as therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.