ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2024
Effectiveness of oral vancomycin as prophylaxis against
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Identification and Characterization of Patient Populations at High Risk for Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI): A Narrative Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- A systematic literature review and bayesian meta-analysis of oral vancomycin primary prophylaxis forAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) are at increased risk for Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort. Setting: Tertiary care academic medical center in New Jersey. Patients: Patients ≥18 years old during admission for the HSCT were included. Patients who were admitted <72 hours or who had an active CDI prior to HSCT day 0 were excluded. Methods: Medical records of patients admitted between January 2015 and August 2022 to undergo an allogeneic or autologous HSCT were reviewed. The primary end point was the incidence of in-hospital CDI. Secondary end points included the incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infections, VRE isolated from any clinical culture, gram-negative bloodstream infections, hospital survival, and hospital length of stay. Exploratory end points, including 1-year survival, relapse, and incidence of graft-versus-host disease, were also collected. Results: A total of 156 HSCT patients were included. There was 1 case of CDI (1 of 81, 1.23%) in the OVP group compared to 8 CDI cases (8 of 75, 10.67%) in the no OVP group ( Conclusions: In-hospital incidence of CDI in HSCT patients was significantly decreased with OVP. Randomized controlled trials are needed in this high-risk population to assess the efficacy and risks of OVP for CDI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.