Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39823112›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025

To increase trust in clinical research: Be worthy of trust and enhance the role of clinical research nurses.

Rita K Devine, Bernadette Capili, Rhonda G Kost, James G Krueger, Barry S Coller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Digital Tools and Strategies for Engaging Patients in Cancer Clinical Trials.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rita K DevineCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Bernadette CapiliCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Rhonda G KostCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5419-0589
James G KruegerCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Barry S CollerCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-7155

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an erosion of trust in medical care and clinical research, and this has raised issues about whether institutions and investigators conducting clinical research are worthy of trust. We review recent literature on research on trust and trustworthiness in the clinical research enterprise and identify opportunities to enhance trustworthiness, which will likely increase participant trust in clinical research. In addition, we review materials reporting the results of national polls related to the public's trust in different occupations. The literature on trustworthiness and trust is complex and suffers from a lack of agreement on definitions of trust and trustworthiness and actions to enhance trustworthiness. Nonetheless, institutions need to take action to address the many elements that contribute to being perceived as trustworthy. As a complementary approach, since nurses have consistently ranked highest on trust by the public for twenty-two straight years, we analyze the features that likely account for the public's uniform high regard for nurses. We propose specific actions to enhance the role of research nurses in the research enterprise, without compromising their primary role as participant advocates, that we have adopted at Rockefeller University to gain the benefits of the public's trust in nurses in building trustworthiness.

Indexed as

clinical researchhealth equityresearch nursingtrustTrustworthiness

Identifiers

PMID39823112
PMCPMC11736296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.