Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39823077›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024

Ultra-processed foods and the strategic manipulation of our evolved motivational tendencies.

David M Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Development and Validation of a New Tool for Assessing the Intake of Ultra-Processed Foods in Adult Population: GR-UPFAST.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David M WilliamsCenter for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is responsible for an increasing proportion of non-communicable diseases and premature mortality. Recognition of the commercial and social determinants of UPF consumption represents an important advance in public health, with implications for interventions that emphasize regulatory policies rather than individual motivation. However, it is important not to lose sight of the motivational mechanisms through which commercial and social determinants exert their effects on unhealthy behavior. Objective: This commentary highlights "Big Food's" exploitation of psychological hedonism-a fundamental human motivational process-as the critical mechanism of UPF consumption, with disproportionate effects on historically marginalized communities. It is not mere availability of UPFs that is the problem. It is the intentional and strategic engineering of UPFs to appeal to the most basic human motivational system that drives our desire and consumption of UPFs. The framing of UPF consumption as the exploitation of natural human motivational tendencies has the potential for increasing the public's acceptance of food regulation policies. Conclusion: In bolstering public support for UPF-regulation we should proliferate the following message: Just like Big Tobacco, Big Food strategically engineers UPFs to manipulate fundamental human motivational processes and amass profits at the expense of public health.

Identifiers

PMID39823077
PMCPMC11738039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.