Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39823068›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2024

Learning effectiveness of clinical anatomy and practical spine surgery skills using a new VR-based training platform.

Maximilian Reinhold, Can Asal, Tobias Driesen, Jonathan Roch, Katharina Jäckle, Susanne Borgmann, Wolfgang Lehmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maximilian ReinholdGoettingen Medical University, Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, D-37099, Goettingen, Germany.
Can AsalNonNocere, Sorauer Str. 14, D-10997, Berlin, Germany.
Tobias DriesenGoettingen Medical University, Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, D-37099, Goettingen, Germany.
Jonathan RochGoettingen Medical University, Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, D-37099, Goettingen, Germany.
Katharina JäckleGoettingen Medical University, Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, D-37099, Goettingen, Germany.
Susanne BorgmannGoettingen Medical University, G1-2 Office of the Dean of Studies/Medical Didactics, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Goettingen, Germany.
Wolfgang LehmannGoettingen Medical University, Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, D-37099, Goettingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As medical education becomes more complex, the demand for advanced teaching and training methods has grown. Technological advancements have opened up new possibilities, particularly in the realm of virtual reality (VR) simulations for training. Research Question: Our prospective, randomized pilot study aims to assess whether a novel VR-based 3D training platform can effectively teach the knowledge and skills needed for complex spinal surgery, specifically pedicle screw placement. Material and MethodsWe enrolled 25 participants who received either a traditional lecture (control group, n=11) or a VR lecture with identical content featuring 3D/VR anatomical models (VR group, n=14). The VR group also underwent VR simulation for pedicle screw placement. We evaluated their learning through a quiz, a practical skills test, and selfassessment questionnaires. Results: In the theory multiple-choice test, the contral group scored an average of 69% (range 53-87%, SD 0.10), while the VR group scored 66% (range 47-87%, SD 0.11) (p=0.692, independent sample t-test).For the practical DOPS test (pedicle screw placement), the average score was 2.4 points (n=25; range 1-4). The VR group on average scored 2.9 points compared to the control (2 points) (p=0.134). Discussion and Conclusion Our study indicates that teaching with a new 3D VR training tool yields results comparable to traditional methods in terms of knowledge retention. This research supports the platform's effectiveness as an educational resource. Importantly, trainees can apply VR-acquired knowledge to real surgical procedures, which are well-received.

Indexed as

Knowledge transferSpine surgerySurgical techniqueTraining methodsVirtual reality (VR)VR-Based 3D training platform

Identifiers

PMID39823068
PMCPMC11735924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.