ReviewInternational journal of women's dermatology2025
The risks of pityriasis rosea in pregnancy: a review.
Review in International journal of women's dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This review aims to consolidate available evidence, identify research gaps, and advocate for a more informed approach to the management of pityriasis rosea in pregnant individuals. Data Sources: PubMed, Web of Science, and Directory of Open Access Journals were systematically searched based on the keywords "pityriasis rosea," "pityriasis circinate," "roseola annulate," "herpes tonsurans maculosus," "herald patch," and "pregnancy" on January 25, 2024 for publications between 1950 to 2024. Study Selection: Studies containing outcomes data for pregnant patients with established PR were included. Studies must have been written or translated into English and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Studies which did not pertain to PR in the setting of pregnancy were excluded, as screened by two reviewers. Responses, general informational reviews, and letters to the editor without novel data were also excluded. Results: Eleven relevant articles were identified, encompassing data from 177 patients. Overall, 81% of patients had favorable outcomes while 19% experienced unfavorable outcomes. PR onset before 15 weeks gestation was associated with a higher rate of unfavorable outcomes (41%), including a 27% rate of spontaneous abortion (SA). Conversely, PR onset after 15 weeks had a lower unfavorable outcome rate (21%), and no instances of SA. Conclusion: Conflicting data exists regarding the impact of PR on pregnancy outcomes. However, PR onset within the first 15 weeks, widespread lesions, constitutional symptoms, and higher human herpesvirus 6 viral loads may increase the risk of unfavorable outcomes such as SA. Close follow-up and consideration of antiviral treatment are recommended for high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.