ArticleDEN open2025
Endoscopic incisional balloon dilation combined with anti-scarring agents for postoperative esophageal anastomotic strictures.
Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the treatment of postoperative anastomotic strictures in esophageal cancer a comparative analysis of the efficacy of endoscopic versus interventional dilatation.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Review
- Mucosal incision combined with balloon dilation as a useful method for anastomotic stricture with ulcer.Endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of locally advanced esophageal cancer typically involves esophagectomy; however, postoperative complications, particularly anastomotic stricture, remain prevalent. Anastomotic stricture can severely compromise patients' quality of life by leading to difficulties in food intake. Although endoscopic balloon dilation has become a standard treatment for gastrointestinal strictures, its efficacy is often limited due to the risk of perforation and the potential for recurrent stricture, necessitating multiple interventions. Recent advancements have introduced endoscopic radial incision and cutting methods, which aim to enhance patency by excising scar tissue. We experienced a case resistant to the radial incision and cutting therapy, necessitating further intervention strategies. This report details our experience utilizing a novel technique, endoscopic incisional balloon dilation, which combines endoscopic incisional technique and balloon dilation therapy with anti-scarring medications, in cases of refractory anastomotic strictures following esophageal cancer resection. We present three challenging cases in which endoscopic incisional balloon dilation yielded significant clinical improvements, alongside supportive literature. Our findings suggest that endoscopic incisional balloon dilation is an effective and safer alternative to conventional methods, capable of addressing complex stricture scenarios while potentially enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.