ArticleBMJ public health2024
Evaluating the effects, implementation experience and political economy of primary healthcare facility autonomy reforms within counties in Kenya: a mixed methods study protocol.
Article in BMJ public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is a growing emphasis on improving primary health care services and granting frontline service providers more decision-making autonomy. In October 2023, Kenya enacted legislation mandating nationwide facility autonomy. There is limited understanding of the effects of health facility autonomy on primary health care (PHC) facilities performance. It is recognized that stakeholder interests influence reforms, and gender plays a critical role in access to health and its outcomes. This protocol outlines the methods for a study that plans to evaluate the effects, implementation experience, political economy, and gendered effects of health facility autonomy reforms in Kenya. Methods and Analysis: The research will use a before-and-after quasi-experimental study design to measure the effects of the reform on service readiness and service utilization, and a cross-sectional qualitative study to explore the implementation experience, political economy, and gendered effects of these reforms. Data to measure the effects of autonomy will be collected from a sample of 80 health facilities and 1600 clients per study arm. Qualitative interviews will involve approximately 83 facility managers and policymakers at the county level, distributed across intervening (36), and planning to intervene (36) counties. Additionally, 11 interviews will be conducted at the national level with representatives from the Ministry of Health, the National Treasury, the Controller of Budget, the Council of Governors, the Auditor General, and development partners. Given the uncertainty surrounding the implementation of the reforms, this study proposes two secondary designs in the event our primary design is not feasible - a cross-sectional study, and a quasi-experimental interrupted time series design. The study will use a difference-in-difference analysis for the quantitative component to evaluate the effects of the reforms, while using thematic analysis for the qualitative component to evaluate the political economy and the implementation experience of the reforms. Ethics and Dissemination:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.