Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822940›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2025

DNA damage response mutations enhance the antitumor efficacy of ATR and PARP inhibitors in cholangiocarcinoma cell lines.

Tassanee Lerksuthirat, Sunisa Prasopporn, Rakkreat Wikiniyadhanee, Sermsiri Chitphuk, Wasana Stitchantrakul, Paravee Owneium, Siwanon Jirawatnotai, Donniphat Dejsuphong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic and epigenetic landscape of OExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tassanee LerksuthiratResearch Center, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Sunisa PrasoppornSiriraj Center of Research for Excellence (SiCORE) for Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Rakkreat WikiniyadhaneeProgram in Translational Medicine, Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samutprakarn 10540, Thailand.
Sermsiri ChitphukResearch Center, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Wasana StitchantrakulResearch Center, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Paravee OwneiumProgram in Translational Medicine, Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samutprakarn 10540, Thailand.
Siwanon JirawatnotaiSiriraj Center of Research for Excellence (SiCORE) for Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Donniphat DejsuphongProgram in Translational Medicine, Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samutprakarn 10540, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a biliary tract carcinoma that is challenging to treat due to its heterogeneity and limited treatment options. Genetic alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways and homologous recombination (HR) defects are common in CCA. This has prompted interest in the use of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors to treat CCA. The present study investigated the impact of an ATR inhibitor and various PARP inhibitors, individually and in combination, on CCA cell lines with different DDR mutation profiles. DDR gene alterations in these cell lines were analyzed, and the responses of the cells to treatment with the PARP inhibitors olaparib, veliparib and talazoparib and/or the ATR inhibitor AZD6738 were evaluated. Assessments focused on cellular viability, clonogenic survival and the combination index, alongside changes in DNA damage assessed via the formation of micronuclei and γ-H2A histone family member X foci. The results revealed that the CCA cell lines with more DDR mutations exhibited greater sensitivity to single and combination treatments. Talazoparib was found to be the most potent PARP inhibitor in the CCA cell lines. The combination of AZD6738 and talazoparib demonstrated varying synergistic effects depending on the genetic background of the CCA cells, with greater efficacy in the cell lines less sensitive to single drug treatments. Mechanistically, this combination promoted the accumulation of DNA damage, including DNA double-strand breaks. Overall, the study underscores the importance of HR in CCA. It reveals an association between the extent of DDR mutations and the response to AZD6738 and PARP inhibitors in CCA, both as single agents and in combination. These findings highlight that the number of mutated genes influences variability in the drug response.

Indexed as

ATR inhibitorbiliary tract cancercholangiocarcinomacombination indexDNA damage responsedrug combinationPARP inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID39822940
PMCPMC11736248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.