Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822925›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2025

System-failing creativity in health care.

Stijn Horck, Rachel E Gifford, Bram P I Fleuren, Cheryl Rathert, Tracy H Porter, Afshan Rauf, Yuna S H Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. System-failing creativity in health care.Learning health systems · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stijn HorckResearch Centre for the Education and Labour Market Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2147-821X
Rachel E GiffordDepartment of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands.
Bram P I FleurenDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands.
Cheryl RathertDepartment of Health Management and Policy, College for Public Health and Social Justice Saint Louis University St. Louis Missouri USA.
Tracy H PorterDepartment of Management, Monte Ahuja College of Business Cleveland State University Cleveland Ohio USA.
Afshan RaufFaculty of Business and Law University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia.
Yuna S H LeeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University New York New York USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Health care professionals often generate novel solutions to solve problems during day-to-day patient care. However, less is known about generating novel and useful (i.e., creative) ideas in the face of health care system failure. System failures are high-impact and increasingly frequent events in health care organizations, and front-line professionals may have uniquely valuable expertise to address such occurrences. Methods: Our interdisciplinary team, blending expertise in health care management, economics, psychology, and clinical practice, reviewed the literature on creativity and system failures in health care to generate a conceptual model that describes this process. Drawing on appraisal theory, we iteratively refined the model by integrating various theories with key concepts of system failures, creativity, and health care worker's well-being. Results: The SFC model provides a conceptualization of creativity from front-line care professionals as it emerges in situations of failure or crisis. It describes the pathways by which professionals respond proactively to a systems failure with creative ideas to effectively address the situation and affect these workers' well-being. Conclusions: Our conceptual model guides health care managers and leaders to use managerial practices to shape their systems and support creativity, especially when facing system failures. It introduces a framework for examining system-failing creativity (SFC) and general creativity, aiming to improve health care quality, health care workers' well-being, and organizational outcomes.

Indexed as

creativityfailurehealth care managementwell‐being

Identifiers

PMID39822925
PMCPMC11733441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.