ArticleLearning health systems2025
Learning health system research as a catalyst for promoting physician wellness: EHR InBasket Spring cleaning and team-based compassion practice.
Article in Learning health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Learning health system research as a catalyst for promoting physician wellness: EHR InBasket Spring cleaning and team-based compassion practice.Learning health systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Addressing physician burnout is critical for healthcare systems. As electronic health record (EHR) workload and teamwork have been identified as major contributing factors to physician well-being, we aimed to mitigate burnout through EHR-based interventions and a compassion team practice (CTP), targeting EHR workload and team cohesion. Methods: A modified stepped wedge-clustered randomized trial was conducted, involving specialties with heavy InBasket workloads. EHR interventions included quick-action shortcuts and recommended practice for secure chats. The CTP comprised 30-s practice between physicians and their dyad partners. Survey and EHR data were collected over four assessment periods. Linear and generalized mixed-effects models assessed intervention effects, accounting for covariates. Results: Forty-four physicians participated (20% participation rate). While burnout prevalence decreased from 58.5% at baseline to 50.0% at the end of the study, burnout reduction was not statistically significant after EHR (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.61, Conclusion: While burnout reduction was not statistically significant, EHR interventions positively impacted workload perceptions. CTP showed potential for improving perceived workplace supportiveness. Further research is needed to explore the efficacy of CTP with more participants. The interventions gained interest beyond our institution and prompted consideration for broader implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.