ArticleArthroplasty today2024
Qualitative Comparison of Cultured Skin Microbiota From the Inguinal Region of Obese and Nonobese Patients Eligible for Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hip Osteoarthritis and the Human Microbiome: Current Concepts, Biological Insights and Future Directions.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the rising prevalence of obesity, surgeons are frequently confronted with the problem of treating osteoarthritis of the hip via arthroplasty (total hip arthroplasty) in severely obese patients. To reduce the surgical impact, minimal-invasive approaches are often chosen. For this reason, the direct anterior approach has gained popularity but is suspected of leading to more wound complications in obese patients, especially by Gram-negative pathogens. Causative differences of the skin microbiome have been suspected but not yet proven. Methods: Patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach were screened for inclusion. The study group was defined as patients with a body mass index ≥35 and an abdominal pannus hanging over the incision site, whereas nonobese patients served as the control group. Samples of the microbiome were taken 2-3 cm distal and lateral to the superior anterior iliac spine using plates and swabs. Species identification was carried out by mass spectrometric analysis. Results: The study group consisted of 28 patients, the control group of 36 patients. The most frequent potential pathogen on the skin was Conclusions: Obese patients with abdominal pannus present higher rates of colonization with Enterobacterales at the incision site of the direct anterior approach. Modifications of the antibiotic regime and the incision should be considered in this special patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.