Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822897›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2024

Compliance with radiation protection among radiographers in Eswatini public health facilities.

Amelia Shungube, Thandokuhle E Khoza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amelia ShungubeDepartment of Radiography, Faculty of Health Science, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7845-5200
Thandokuhle E KhozaDepartment of Radiography, Faculty of Health Science, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0683-683X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The consequence of non-compliance with patient radiation safety standards increases unnecessary radiation exposure with high chances of harmful biological effects. Radiographers are trained to prevent these harmful effects by enforcing radiation protection, which is achieved through proper techniques, equipment, shielding materials and beam collimation. Aim: The study aimed to explore compliance with radiation protection by radiographers in Eswatini public health facilities (PHFs). Setting: Eswatini PHFs with radiography departments (RDs) representing all four regions in the country. Methods: The study applied a qualitative exploratory design. Purposive sampling was used to select participants. In-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted with radiographers (who have at least 2 years of work experience) until data saturation was achieved with the 13th participant. Data were analysed thematically. Results: A total of three themes were identified from the data analysis, namely participants' attitudes towards compliance with radiation safety standards; participants' subjective norms; and perceived behavioural control factors. Conclusion: The study demonstrated radiographers' awareness and knowledge of patient radiation safety standards. However, compliance with the standards remained a personal decision as radiographers are not obliged to comply. Moreover, defective lead protective devices, the unavailability of the full scope of lead protective designs, the inappropriate design of the RD building and unauthorised staff making unjustified X-ray requests contributed to non-compliance. Contribution: The study highlighted a gap in compliance with patient radiation safety standards that requires attention from Eswatini's Ministry of Health (MOH).

Indexed as

as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)complianceionising radiationradiationradiation protectionradiation safetyradiation safety standards

Identifiers

PMID39822897
PMCPMC11736565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.