ArticleBiostatistics & epidemiology2024
Adjusting for bias due to measurement error in functional quantile regression models with error-prone functional and scalar covariates.
Article in Biostatistics & epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correcting Measurement Error and Zero Inflation in Functional Covariates for Scalar-on-Function Quantile Regression.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Reducing bias and enhancing equity in AI-enabled precision nutrition: addressing measurement error across wearables, multiomics, and dietary data.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable devices enable the continuous monitoring of physical activity (PA) but generate complex functional data with poorly characterized errors. Most work on functional data views the data as smooth, latent curves obtained at discrete time intervals with some random noise with mean zero and constant variance. Viewing this noise as homoscedastic and independent ignores potential serial correlations. Our preliminary studies indicate that failing to account for these serial correlations can bias estimations. In dietary assessments, epidemiologists often use self-reported measures based on food frequency questionnaires that are prone to recall bias. With the increased availability of complex, high-dimensional functional, and scalar biomedical data potentially prone to measurement errors, it is necessary to adjust for biases induced by these errors to permit accurate analyses in various regression settings. However, there has been limited work to address measurement errors in functional and scalar covariates in the context of quantile regression. Therefore, we developed new statistical methods based on simulation extrapolation (SIMEX) and mixed effects regression with repeated measures to correct for measurement error biases in this context. We conducted simulation studies to establish the finite sample properties of our new methods. The methods are illustrated through application to a real data set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.