Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822860›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025

Roving pen: minimally invasive mitral surgery.

Hamrish Kumar Rajakumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hamrish Kumar RajakumarGovernment Medical College, Omandurar Government Estate, Chennai 02, Tamilnadu India.ORCID 0009-0008-9642-9915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is revolutionizing the field of cardiothoracic surgery by offering patients less invasive alternatives to conventional sternotomy. This article reviews recent research and studies on the outcomes, challenges, and considerations surrounding MIMVS. Comparative studies reveal that while MIMVS offers advantages such as shorter hospital stays and reduced recovery times, it shows no significant differences in mortality or long-term quality-of-life outcomes compared to traditional methods. Techniques like mini-thoracotomy and artificial chordae have demonstrated safety and efficacy, although specific challenges such as higher rates of recurrent mitral regurgitation and the need for extensive postoperative monitoring persist. The learning curve for MIMVS emphasizes the importance of surgical expertise, with improved outcomes observed after mastering the procedure. Furthermore, complex degenerative mitral regurgitation presents unique challenges but can be effectively managed with tailored approaches. Patient selection, surgeon experience, and individualized treatment strategies are pivotal factors in achieving optimal results. While promising, the overall benefits of MIMVS require further exploration through large-scale randomized trials focusing on patient-reported outcomes and long-term success.

Indexed as

ComplicationsMinimally invasiveMitral valve repairOutcomesTechniques

Identifiers

PMID39822860
PMCPMC11732819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.