ArticleCurrent treatment options in rheumatology2024
Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: An appraisal of the 2023 ACR/CHEST guideline.
Article in Current treatment options in rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extra-articular rheumatoid arthritis: example of RA-associated interstitial lung disease.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Review
- Molecular insights into the anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects of licorice-ginger decoction in experimental models of inflammatory arthritis-associated lung fibrosis.Immunology and cell biology · 2026Article
- Pathogenesis and immune regulation of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: from basic research to clinical implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Revisiting B-cell targeted therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: from paradoxical biology to deep immune reset.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Breaking the cycle: should we target inflammation, fibrosis, or both?Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of review: To summarize the current treatment landscape of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) in the context of the recent 2023 American College of Rheumatology/American College of Chest Physicians guideline for ILD treatment in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Recent findings: The guideline conditionally recommends mycophenolate, azathioprine, and rituximab for first-line RA-ILD therapy, with cyclophosphamide and short-term glucocorticoids as additional options. For RA-ILD progression after first line, mycophenolate, rituximab, nintedanib, tocilizumab, cyclophosphamide, and pirfenidone are conditionally recommended, while long-term glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended against. Only three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolled patients with RA-ILD (total n=217). All other recommendations for RA-ILD were based on RCTs for other diseases or observational data. Antifibrotics might be particularly effective for patients with RA-ILD and the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern (RA-UIP). There is uncertainty of the utility of azathioprine and glucocorticoids in RA-UIP since these medications had worse outcomes compared to placebo in an RCT of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. RA-ILD treatment decisions should consider articular activity, ILD activity, comorbidities, and potential for infection. Summary: We summarized the current treatment landscape for RA-ILD. Since only three RCTs included patients with RA-ILD, most guideline recommendations were conditional and based on low-quality evidence. This highlights the urgent need for additional high-quality RCT data for efficacy and safety of anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic medications for RA-ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.