ArticleJSES international2024
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Indonesian version of the Oxford Shoulder Score for patients with shoulder pain.
Article in JSES international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: No questionnaire is currently available for use in patients with shoulder pain in an Indonesian-speaking population. This study aimed to translate the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) into Indonesian and assess its validity and reliability for use in Indonesian-speaking patients with shoulder pain. Methods: After a forward and backward translation procedure, the validity and reliability of the questionnaire were investigated. All patients who were treated in a hospital in Indonesia for shoulder pain during the inclusion period were asked to complete 3 questionnaires: the Indonesia-OSS (I-OSS), the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire. Participants were asked to complete the I-OSS a second time after a 1-week interval. Following Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments guidelines, construct validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, and measurement error were determined. The Bland-Altman method was used to explore systematic bias. Results: Data of 100 patients could be used to determine validity, and data of 87 patients to determine test-retest reliability. Construct validity can be considered good, as more than 75% of the predefined hypotheses on correlations between the I-OSS and the other questionnaires could be confirmed. An intraclass correlation coefficient value of 0.99 was found, indicating good test-retest reliability. A Cronbach's α of 0.95 implied good internal consistency, and no floor or ceiling effects were found. The standard error of measurement was 1.8, with minimal detectable change at the individual level was 5.1, and at the group level was 0.5. Bland-Altman analysis showed no systematic bias. Conclusion: The I-OSS can be considered a valid and reliable questionnaire for Indonesian-speaking patients with shoulder pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.