ArticleJSES international2024
Three-dimensional glenohumeral relationship in cuff tear arthropathy and its correlation with the type of cuff tear.
Article in JSES international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The main purpose of this study is to evaluate 1) the three-dimensional (3D) glenohumeral relationship in cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) and 2) the correlation between different types of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and the 3D glenohumeral relationship. Method: A total of 124 patients with CTA and 60 control patients were included in this study. 3D models of computed tomography images of the shoulder were reconstructed to evaluate the position of the humerus in relation to the scapula using a Cartesian coordinate system. The glenohumeral relationship of the CTA group is compared to the control group (group N). Next, the CTA group is divided into three subgroups depending on the (im)balance of the transverse force couple (TFC): a balanced RCT group (group B, n = 50), a group with an imbalance of the TFC to anterior (group A, n = 30), and a group with an imbalance of the TFC to posterior (group P, n = 44). The glenohumeral relationship of the RCT group is compared to a control group of 60 patients without RCT (group N). Results: The CTA group (96° ± 1°) was significant ( Conclusion: All patients with CTA have a significantly superior position of the humerus compared to the control group. If the TFC is unbalanced, a significantly more anterior or posterior translation of the humerus is observed depending on the direction of the imbalance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.