ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Perceptibility and Acceptability Thresholds for Color Differences in Ceramic Shade Tabs: A Comparison Between Dentists and Patients.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Effects of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion on the anterior maxillary teeth and trabecular bone structure: a controlled clinical study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Color stability of multilayer resin composite versus feldspathic ceramics after immersion in different beverages.Odontology · 2026Article
- Effect of different surface treatments on color and translucency of two different ceramic materials (an invitro study).BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Color and translucency changes induced by try-in media in bleach-shade CAD/CAM ceramic discs: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The Impact of Coffee, Matcha, Protein Drinks, and Water Storage on the Microhardness and Color Stability of a Nano-Ceramic Hybrid Composite CAD/CAM Blank.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 50%:50% perceptibility thresholds (PT) and acceptability thresholds (AT) for color differences in ceramic shade tabs observed by dentists and patients using CIEDE2000 color difference formula. Material and Methods: Twenty-two combinations of ceramic shade tabs from the VITA 3D Master shade guide were assembled to be used for the visual comparison analyses. The color difference between each shade tab pair was numerically determined by spectrophotometry using the VITA EasyShade V, and calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula (ΔE00). Twenty dentists and twenty patients were recruited for this study. All participants performed the visual assessment of the provided shade tab pairs under D65 illumination and a grey background, and requested to determine if they could perceive a color difference between them (PT) and whether they considered the combination clinically acceptable (AT). The correlation between numeric data of color difference between the shade tabs, and the perceptibility and acceptability thresholds given by the participants was analyzed by logistic regression (α=0.05; β=0.0085). Results: The PT for dentists was ΔE00= 2.29, and ΔE00= 2.27 for patients. The AT for dentists was ΔE00=2,41, and ΔE00=2,83 for patients. The results showed a statistically significant difference between PT and AT thresholds for both dentists and patients. However, there was no statistically significant differences in PT ( Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it was possible to conclude that while the PT and AT vary significantly within each group, they are statistically similar between dentists and patients when discriminating color differences in ceramic tabs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.