Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39822796›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024

Perceptibility and Acceptability Thresholds for Color Differences in Ceramic Shade Tabs: A Comparison Between Dentists and Patients.

Vanessa Schussler, Daniel Yuydi Kawakami, Marco Antonio Garcia Rocha, Mario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Mateus Garcia Rocha, Dayane Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vanessa SchusslerD.D.S, M.S. Candidate. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, University of Florida, College of Dentistry, 1395 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Daniel Yuydi KawakamiD.D.S, Alumni, Dentist. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira 901, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Marco Antonio Garcia RochaD.D.S, Dentist, Research Volunteer. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, University of Florida, College of Dentistry, 1395 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Mario Alexandre Coelho SinhoretiD.D.S., M.S., Ph.D, Full Professor. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira 901, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Mateus Garcia RochaD.D.S., M.S., Ph.D, Clinical Associate Professor. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, University of Florida, College of Dentistry, 1395 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Dayane OliveiraD.D.S., M.S., Ph.D. Clinical Associate Professor. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, University of Florida, College of Dentistry, 1395 Center Drive, College of Dentistry, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 50%:50% perceptibility thresholds (PT) and acceptability thresholds (AT) for color differences in ceramic shade tabs observed by dentists and patients using CIEDE2000 color difference formula. Material and Methods: Twenty-two combinations of ceramic shade tabs from the VITA 3D Master shade guide were assembled to be used for the visual comparison analyses. The color difference between each shade tab pair was numerically determined by spectrophotometry using the VITA EasyShade V, and calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula (ΔE00). Twenty dentists and twenty patients were recruited for this study. All participants performed the visual assessment of the provided shade tab pairs under D65 illumination and a grey background, and requested to determine if they could perceive a color difference between them (PT) and whether they considered the combination clinically acceptable (AT). The correlation between numeric data of color difference between the shade tabs, and the perceptibility and acceptability thresholds given by the participants was analyzed by logistic regression (α=0.05; β=0.0085). Results: The PT for dentists was ΔE00= 2.29, and ΔE00= 2.27 for patients. The AT for dentists was ΔE00=2,41, and ΔE00=2,83 for patients. The results showed a statistically significant difference between PT and AT thresholds for both dentists and patients. However, there was no statistically significant differences in PT ( Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it was possible to conclude that while the PT and AT vary significantly within each group, they are statistically similar between dentists and patients when discriminating color differences in ceramic tabs.

Identifiers

PMID39822796
PMCPMC11733899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.