ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Management of a clinical case of caries lesions by undergraduate dentistry students.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dental caries remains the most prevalent chronic disease worldwide. Hence the importance of detecting and evaluating caries and combining this with additional diagnostic methods to ensure the best treatment. The main objective was to study what is the sensitivity and specificity for detecting initial and cavitated caries lesions by students in third, fourth and fifth year of the Degree in Dentistry at the University of Barcelona, analysing if there is any difference between the diagnoses and treatments among the different years and each student's clinical experience. It was also determined if they apply the techniques based on the concepts of minimal intervention. Material and Methods: An observational cross-sectional study using an online survey was performed, based on a real clinical case, aimed at the students in third, fourth and fifth year of the Degree in Dentistry at the University of Barcelona. Results: Most of the respondents (72.13%) observed demineralization or cavities caused by caries in the clinical image and all in the radiographic image (100%). Meanwhile, they showed a more conservative attitude in the treatment of occlusal face, where 23.08% in 4.6 and 46.25% in 4.7 indicate filling of pits and fissures. On the other hand, on the proximal faces, they directly opted for a class II filling (95% in 4.5 distal, 94% in 4.6 mesial and 84% in 4.6 distal). Eighty-five percent of the students considered applying techniques based on the concepts of minimal intervention. Conclusions: The students use similar criteria when diagnosing and treating possible caries lesions regardless of academic year or clinical experience. The personal evaluation of the application of the concepts of minimal intervention does not correlate with the clinical attitude to those cases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.